1. What
impact do you think the Green Party's eco-socialist policies have had on the
party's growth and how can that be sustained?
500+ Councillors and our best ever result - I think it’s clear that the party
is on a very exciting trajectory, and communities love seeing what electing a
Green means for them. It’s really important we maintain that and accelerate it
further - it’s vital that we win more MPs.
One of the ways we win MPs is by being seen and heard more on the media - and
that’s why we really need that break through. We need Greens on the TV and
radio all the time speaking clearly and authentically about the changes our
society need. A Green New Deal, a Universal Basic Income and Proportional
Representation (The game changer that means growth will ultimately be much more
sustainable under a fair voting system.)
This is especially important right now – people in our country are facing huge
stresses on their lives and this will only increase in coming months. Labour
are reverting to Blairite centrism - their solutions won’t address the deep
problems neoliberalism causes. Only our policy platform would make our country
genuinely fairer and make sure we truly look after those who are most
vulnerable – so we must be heard.
2. The recent Tory by-election defeats suggest
the electorate are making their own decisions on strategic voting. How can the
Green Party intervene to turn that to its advantage?
It’s clear that many within the Labour party are coming round to Proportional
Representation. Over 80% of their members back it - but Keir Starmer is
refusing to get involved. We’re a party that believes in collaboration and
working for the common good. Labour are refusing to collaborate though - unlike
the excellent work with Plaid in Cardiff for instance, that won two council
seats - so until they come to the table, I think our best focus is to keep
winning Green representation and making the case for environmental, social,
racial and economic justice.
3. What would be your priorities for campaigns
outside election periods that would raise our profile in communities, engage
our members and attract new ones? How could that be financed?
I tend to argue there is no such thing as being outside of an election period!
We need to be continually investing in elections, whether that’s campaigning on
the ground or planning and capacity building for ambitious growth. But key to
raising our profile is building our story. We need to be bold and clear with
our transformational platform. We need our green elected representatives to be
seen and heard on the picket lines for instance standing up with workers, at
marches and rallies against may of the heinous policies of this Conservative
Government and crucially - still doorknocking in their communities. It’s not
just an activity for when we want peoples votes - it needs to be genuine
engagement all year round.
To finance this, and to achieve our general election aspirations, we need to
grow our fundraising capability significantly – at all levels of the party.
Focused investment in the staff team and our infrastructure is the key to this.
4. How can the Party improve the way it
communicates its policies to the BAME and white working class?
We need to be in those communities listening to people. We can’t expect people
to come to local party meetings where they don’t feel represented - but we must
actively be understanding what they want from our party. We need to make sure
that we articulate successfully how the values and policies of the Green Party
aren’t just solutions to the climate crisis but there’s no environmental
justice without social, racial and economic justice too. That can’t just be a
slogan - it needs to be a transformative agenda to lift people out of poverty
and combat racism and discrimination.
5. Should the Green Party review its policy on
NATO in the light of the current conflict in Ukraine and what would be your
approach?
Yes. I think the policy is the right one but it’s clear in the current world
context that it’s inappropriately articulated. I’d very much welcome a change
to the policy that made it more explicit it’s a long term aspiration. (Worth
pointing out that Article 12 of NATO’s own founding charter envisages a
situation where the security situation could change so as to make NATO’s role
redundant!)
6. The 24 hours news cycle means that
contributions from our spokespeople have to be rapid if they are to be given
media space. How can we manage that whilst maintaining democratic accountability?
We definitely need more agility to be able to respond to events. At the same
time - members’ democratic right to vote on policy is vital to our party’s
ethos and how we work and something I will always uphold - it’s a vital
difference to the established parties and a big reason I am a Green.
I think it can go unrecognised just how quickly the leadership have to make
judgements on changing events, whilst communicating with the relevant policy
bodies and elected Greens, then get sign off from governance bodies to confirm
any new position stays within the letter and spirit of Green Party policy.
This process isn’t perfect - I’m sure we can streamline it in a way that keeps
democratic oversight and actually expands the number of people and groups that
are consulted, but at some level we are always going to need to have trust in
our leaders when it comes to responding to the news. That’s why we elect them
and why we have regular elections.
7. Given that some Government policies such as
privatisation and reducing rights are a thread crossing different sectors how
can spokespeople cooperate on our overall messaging to ensure this is
addressed?
I think this is starting to improve already with spokespeople in better
communication with each other. It is vital that none of our policy areas
are ever siloed. We’re a holistic party that recognises everything is
interconnected - and it’s important that there’s regular check ins with
spokespeople to see what work everyone is focusing on.
As a more general point - I’d like to see our members' website upgraded to
enable a much better messaging capacity right across the board.
8. How would you raise the international
relevance and profile of the GPEW?
I’ve already been doing a lot of this work as an Assembly Member - I love the
internationalism of our party and that we’re a global movement. Examples are
that during COP26 I attended a Global Greens event with Caroline Lucas, Natalie
Bennett and Green MPs from all around the world.
This year alone I have met in person (by train!) with the Green Mayor of
Budapest, Cologne, Ghent, Staadt and with French MPs and the co-leader of the
Greens.
And next week I’m welcoming Jamie Parker MP - one of the Australian Greens to
City Hall.
9. The Green Party has recently encountered
difficulties in maintaining a respectful and comradely debate on issues where
there has been sharp disagreement. What would be your approach to improving the
atmosphere in which these debates take place?
We’ve got to be clear about where our red lines are and our policies are very
clear. We are a party that engages in debate and complex discussion. We’re not
a party that will tolerate discrimination or offensive hate speech.
I really admire the work Amelia Womack has been doing around “Always Learning”
which is encouraging conversations with people with lived experience to
describe their perspectives - and answer questions. As Deputy Leader I would
want to see this kind of work continue.
As a former local party chair I also know there’s lots of work that can be done
around facilitation training in local party meetings, how to create a kinder
and more inclusive space.
10. How can we ensure a level playing field in internal
elections when some candidates have the advantage of access to a national
platform and networks?
As the candidate in an elected role - I’m really proud of the work I do as
a London Assembly Member, as Chair of the Environment Committee and as the
spokesperson for Democracy & Citizen Engagement.
I think when people are achieving wins in their roles as elected Green
representatives - then that makes them good, experienced candidates to be in
national leadership positions.
I think it’s vital to always keep the all members’ email and independently
organised hustings. The candidate statements and so on should be within a low
spending limit so that the contest isn’t a matter of who can raise the most
funds and so that there’s a large aspect of the contest where the candidates
can be directly compared.
No comments:
Post a Comment